Interactivity and Political Communication: New Media Tools and their Impact on Public Political Communication

Burton Speakman

Abstract


Based on the interactivity theory, this study examines relationships between people’s political media commentary online and through traditional methods. Data from Pew Research Center (N= 2,253) shows that those who were actively participated in political discourse using traditional methods were more likely to make statements on newspaper websites and using social media about politics. Higher level of education also predicted participation in political communication in the new media environment.

Keywords


Interactivity; Motivation; New Media; Traditional Media; Social Media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakker, T., & de Vreese, C. (2011). Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet

Use, and Political Participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451– 470.

Becker, J., Clement, M., & Schaedel, U. (2010). The Impact of Network Size and

Financial Incentives on Adoption and Participation in New Online Communities.

Journal of Media Economics, 23, 165–179.

Bolton, R., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T.,

Loureiro, Y.K., & Solnet, D. (2014). Understanding Generation Y and their use of

social media: a review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management , 24

(3), 245—267.

Carr, D., Barnidge, M., Lee, B., & Tsang, S. (2014). Cynics and Skeptics: Evaluating the

Credibility of Mainstream and Citizen Journalism. Journalism & Mass

Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 452– 470.

Chan, M., & Guo, J. (2013). The Role of Political Efficacy on the Relationship Between

Facebook Use and Participatory Behaviors: A Comparative Study of Young

American and Chinese Adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(3), 460-463.

Choi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. M. (2013). The Digital Divide Among Low-Income

Homebound Older Adults: Internet Use Patterns, eHealth Literacy, and Attitudes

Toward Computer/Internet Use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5).

Choudrie, J., Ghinea, G., & Songonuga, V. N. (2013). Silver Surfers, E-government and

the Digital Divide: An Exploratory Study of UK Local Authority Websites and Older Citizens. Interacting with Computers, 1-31.

Chung, D., & Nah, S. (2009). The Effects of Interactive News Presentation on Perceived

User Satisfaction of Online Community Newspapers. Journal of Computer-

Mediated Communication, 14, 855–874.

Ellis, J. (2014, October 21). Where You Get Your News Depends on Where You Stand on

The Issues. Retrieved from NiemanLab: http://www.niemanlab.org/2014/10/ where-you -get -your-news-depends-on-where-you-stand-on-the-issues/

Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2008). Digital Media and Youth: Unparalled Opportunity

and Unprecedented Responsbility. In M. Metzger, & A. Flanagin, Digital Media,

Youth, and Credibility (pp. 5-28). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

Garrison, B. (2001). Diffusion of Online Information Technologies in Newspaper

Newsrooms. Journalism and New Technologies, 2(2), 221–239.

Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the

Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline?

The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 710-716.

Guillen, M., & Suarez, S. (2006). Explaining the Global Digital Divide: Economic,

Political and Sociological Drivers of Cross-National Internet Use. Social Forces,

(2), 681-708.

Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity Reexamined: A Baseline Analysis of Early

Business Web Sites. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457-474.

Hilbert, H. (2010). When is Cheap, Cheap Enough to Bridge the Digital Divide?

Modeling Income Related Structural Challenges of Technology Diffusion in Latin

America. World Development, The Multi-Disciplinary International Journal Devoted to the Study and Promotion of World Development, 38(5), 756-770.

Hoffman, D., & Novak, T. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated

Environments: Conceptual Foundations. Journal Of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68.

Hull, K., & Lewis, N. (2014). Why Twitter Displaces Broadcast Sports Media: A Model.

International Journal of Sport Communication, 7, 16-33.

Jenkins, H., & Carpentier, N. (2013). Theorizing Participatory Intensities: A

Conversation About Participation and Politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(3), 265-286.

Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A Concept Explication. New Media & Societ, 4(3), 355–

Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting

Closer: The Effects of Personalized and Interactive Online Political

Communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53-66.

Kushin, M., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did Social Media Really Matter? College

Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 608-630.

Kwak, N., Williams, A., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking Politics and Engaging

Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural

Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement. Communication Research,

(1), 87-111.

Larsson, A. (2011). Interactive to Me – Interactive to You? A Study of Use and

Appreciation of Interactivity on Swedish Newspaper Websites. New Media &

Society, 13(7), 1180–1197.

Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B.

(2010). Attitudes Toward Online Social Connection and Self-Disclosure as

Predictors of Facebook Communication and Relational Closeness. Communication Research, 38(1), 27–53.

Lilleker, D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2013). Online Political Communication Strategies:

MEPs, E-Representation, and Self-Representation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(2), 190-207.

Matzat, U. (2010). Reducing Problems of Sociability in Online Communities: Integrating

Online Communication With Offline Interaction. American Behavioral Scientist,

(8), 1170–1193.

McMillan, S., & Hwang, J. (2002). Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration

of the Role of Direction of Commvinication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29-42.

Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. (2014). Section 2: Social Media,

Political News and Ideology. Retrieved from Pew Research Center's Journalism

Project: http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/section-2-social-media-political-news-and-ideology/

Peña-López, I. (2010). From Laptops to Competences: Bridging the Digital Divide in

Education. RUSC: Revista De Universidad Y Sociedad Del Conocimiento, 7(1), 21-32.

Pew Research Center. (2013). August 2012 — Civic Engagement. Retrieved from Pew

Research Internet Project: http://www.pewinternet.org/datasets/august-2012-civic-engagement/

Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer-

Mediated Communication, 2 (4).

Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1998). Interactivity on the Nets. In F. Sudweeks, M.

McLaughlin, & S. Rafaeli, Network Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet (pp.

-189). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.

Rafaeli, S., & Ariel, Y. (2008). Online motivational factors: Incentives for participation

and contribution in Wikipedia. In A. Barak, Psychological aspects of cyberspace:

Theory, research, applications (pp. 243-267). Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge

University Press.

Scheufele, D. (2002). Examining Differential Gains From Mass Media and Their

Implications for Participatory Behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 46-65.

Schultz, T. (2000). Mass Media and the Concept of Interactivity: An Exploratory Study

of Online Forums and Reader Email. Media Culture Society, 22, 205-221.

Scott, J., Millard, D., & Leonard, P. (2014). Citizen Participation in News: An Analysis

of the Lndscape of Online Journalism. Digital Journalism, 1-22.

Smith, E. E. (2012). The Digital Native Debate in Higher Education: A Comparative

Analysis of Recent Literature. Canadian Journal Of Learning & Technology, 38(3), 1-18.

van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2010). Internet Skills and the Digital Divide. New Media

& Society, 13 (6), 1–19.

van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2013). The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in

Usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526.

Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s

Complicated: Facebook Users’ Political Participation in the 2008 Election.

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 107-114.

Walther, J. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and

Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.

Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. (2003). Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online

Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community.

Electronic Markets, 13(1), 33-45.

Weaver, D., & Drew, D. (2001) Voter Learning and Interest in the 2000 Presidential

Election: Did the Media Matter? Journalism and Mass Communication

Quarterly. 78(4). 787-798.

Xenos, M., & Foot, K. (2008). Not Your Father's Internet: The Generation Gap in Online

Politics. In W. Bennett, Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media can

Engage Youth (pp. 51-70). Cambridge, Ma: The MIT Press.

Zhang, X. (2013). Income disparity and digital divide: The Internet Consumption Model

and cross-country empirical research. Telecommunications Policy, 37, 515-529.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17349/jmc115207

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Media Critiques [JMC]