DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AS A SOURCE OF CREATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL RESOURCE AND SERVICE DELIVERY: BUILDING A CLIMATE FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY WITH DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY

Tomi Niemi

Abstract


Article suggests that deliberative democracy enables creative climate for organizational development connecting organizational creativity and digitalization together. Deliberative democracy processes deliver a solution for organizations to benefit digital transformation in creative ways. Three factors of digitalization, organizational creativity and deliberative democracy have different roles in the equation but when connected they create a functional opportunity for the use of digital possibilities. Developing digital era provides endless opportunities and advantages for people and organizations but along changing times comes also challenges and unexpected consequences. Rapidly developing digital technology is leading the way in connectivity, interaction and opening novel ways to offer services and design products. Along digitalization people’s needs and demands are following the path of developing digital solutions. In these changing times, organizations are confronting a new era where technology is showing the way of new organization culture with the characters of transparency, participation and immediate responsiveness. Success requires the need for keeping up with the pace of digital development and foreseeing future possibilities and anticipating coming consequences. Creativity functions as a partner with digital technology enabling new discoveries from digital sources. Organizational creativity applies divergent and diverse approaches for the development of unique, novel and useful solutions for the greater performance of organizational operations. This article identifies deliberative democracy as potential option for creative development processes. Article concludes by recognizing the interconnectedness between considered concepts.

Keywords


Digital technology, Digital transformation, Organizational creativity, Organization development, Deliberative Democracy

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Ackerman, B. & Fishkin J. (2002). Deliberation Day. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2): 129–152.

Agars, M. D., Kaufman, J. C. & Locke, T. R. (2008). Social Influnece and Creativity in Organizations: A Multi-Level Lens for Theory, Research and Practice. In Mumford, M. D., Hunter S. T. & Bedell-Avers, K. E. (Eds) Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, E Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 3–61

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.

Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1): 39–58.

Bajer, J. (2017). Digital transformation needs the human touch. Strategic HR Review, 16(2): 91–92.

Bekkers, V. (2012). Why does e-government looks as it does? Looking beyond the explanatory emptiness of the e-government concept. Information Policy, 17, 329–342.

Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, Measuring, Enhancing Collective Creative Problem-Solving Efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11(3): 199–229.

Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R. & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Leadership, creative problem-solving capacity and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management, 52(1): 95–122.

Carson, L. (2011). Dilemmas, Disasters and Deliberative Democracy: Getting the Public Back into Policy. Griffith REVIEW edition 32: Wicked Problems, Exquisite Dilemmas, 25–32.

Cummings, A. & Oldham, G. R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40(1): 22–38.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. & Tinkler, J. (2005). New Public Management Is Dead: Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494.

Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory, 29, 651–669.

Egan, T. M. (2005). Factors influencing individual creativity in the workplace: An examination of quantitative empirical research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2): 160–181.

Felicetti, A., Gastil, J., Hartz-Karp, J. & Carson, L. (2012). Collective Identity and Voice at the Australian Citizens’ Parliament. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(1): 1–27.

Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5(9): 444–454.

Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426.

Kira, M. & Frieling, E. (2007). Bureaucratic Boundaries for Collective Learning in Industrial Work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(5): 296–310.

Kozáková, V. (2013). Innovation and Creativity in Public sector. International Public Administration Review, 11(3–4): 83–98.

Landemore, H. E. (2012). Why the many are smarter than the few and why it matters. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(1): 1–12.

Lantz, A. & Brav, A. (2007). Job Design for Learning in Work Groups. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(5): 269–285.

Lanzolla, G. & Anderson, J. (2008). Digital transformation. Business Strategy Review, 19(2): 72–76.

McNutt, K. (2014). Public engagement in the Web 2.0 era: Social collaborative technologies in a public sector context. Canadian Public Administration, 57(1): 49–70.

Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2011). A Complexity Theory Approach to Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study in Two London NHS Hospitals. The Learning Organization, 18(1): 45–53.

Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity Syndrome: Intergration, Application and Innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1): 27–43.

Munno, G. & Nabatchi, T. (2014). Public Deliberation and Co-Production in the Political and Electoral Arena: A Citizens’ Jury Approach. Journal of Public Deliberation, 10(2): 1–29.

Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(4): 376–399.

Nijstad, B. A. & De Deur, C. K. W. (2002). Creativity and Group Innovation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3): 400–406.

Oldham, G. R. & Da Silva, N. (2015). The impact of digital technology on the generation and implementation of creative ideas in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior 42, 5–11.

Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen J. & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(1): 63–77.

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto R. A.& Dow, T. T. (2004). Why isn’t Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls and Future Directions in Creativity Research.

Educational Psychologists, 39(2): 83–96.

Reddy, S. & Reinartz, W. (2017). Digital Transformation and Value Creation: Sea Change Ahead. Value in the Digital Era, 9(1): 10–17.

Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. United Kingdom: Capstone Publishing Ltd.

Rochet, C., Keramidas, O. & Bout, L. (2008). Crisis as Change Strategy in Public Organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1): 65–77.

Runco, M. A. (2008). Creativity Research Should Be a Social Science. In Mumford M. D., Hunter S. T. & Bedell-Avers K. E. (Eds), Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 75–94.

Runco, M. A. (2015). Meta-Creativity: Being Creativity About Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(3): 295–298.

Runco, M. A. & Jaeger G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journa, 24(1): 92–96.

Soriano de Alencar, E. M. L. (2012). Creativity in Organizations: Facilitators and Inhibitors. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed), Handbook of Organizational Creativity, Elsevier Science, London, pp. 87–114

Sprain, L. & Gastil, J. (2013). What Does It Mean to Deliberate? An Interpretative Account of Jurors’ Expressed Deliberative Rules and Premises. Communication Quarterly, 61(2): 151–171.

Sunita & Minny Narang (2014). E-Governance: A Move towards Better Governance. The International Journal of Business and Management, 2(2): 6–8.

Vartiainen, P. (2009). Ihmisillä on oikeus tietää: Arvioinnin demokraattiset piirteet. In Rajala, T., Sinervo, L-M. and Vakkuri, J. (Eds), Talouden perusteista julkisjohtamisen käytäntöihin: Kunnallistalouden emeritusprofessori Pentti Meklinin juhlakirja, University of Tampere, Tampere, 327–337.

Von Krogh, G., & Geilinger, N. (2014). Knowledge creation in the eco-system: Research imperatives. European Management Journal 32, 155–163.

West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Interactive Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3): 355¬−424.

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer J. E., & Griffin R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2): 293–321.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17349/jmc118218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Media Critiques [JMC]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.