EXTERNALISED POWER ON FACEBOOK

Ekaterina Netchitailova

Abstract


Following the recent scandal involving Facebook and Cambridge Analytica it’s time to look again at what sort of power users on Facebook and other online social networks really have. They have the possibility to join the site for free, create content and exchange pictures with relatives and friends. However, while Facebook changed its privacy policy following the scandal, it remains long and ambitious and clearly states that it still collects data of its users. Sites such as Facebook operate within soft-capitalism where in exchange of free service we provide content and information about ourselves. When we join something for free, it creates an illusion of power on the part of the users, while ultimately, it takes the real power away from them and gives it to corporations. I propose to call power that we can find on online social networks externalised power


Keywords


Facebook, power, capitalism, externalised power, Panopticon, data-mining, privacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrahamson, D. (2005). The Facebook.com: Big Brother with a smile. [online]. Infowars. Article from Infowars last accessed 12 January 2010 at http://www.infowars.com/articles

Bauman,, Z. (1996). Tourists and Vagabonds, Heroes and Victims of Postmodernity, Political Science Series 30, Reihe Politikwissenschaft.

Beer, D. (2008). Social network(ing) sites…revisiting the story so far: A response to danah boyd & Nicole Ellison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 516-529.

Cambell,, C. (2005). The Craft Consumer: Culture, Craft and Consumption in a postmodern Society, Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol., No. 1, pp. 23-42.

Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Creeber, G. and Martin, R. (2009). Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media. Open University Press.

Debord, G. (1992). Society of the Spectacle. London, Rebel Press.

Dery, M. (2010). Culture Jamming: Hacking, Slashing, and Sniping in the Empire of Signs. [online]. Last accessed on 25 April 2018 at http://markdery.com/?page_id=154

Doyle, W. and Fraser, M. (2010). Facebook, Surveillance, and Power. In Wittkower, D.E. (ed). Facebook and Philosophy. Carus Publishing Company.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punishment. London, Tavistock.

Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Theory, 8 (4), 777-795.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Brighton. Harvester.

Fuchs, Ch. (2008). Internet and Society. Social Theory in the Information Age. New York, London, Routledge.

Fuchs, Ch. (2009). Information and Communication Technologies and Society. A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of the Internet. European Journal of Communication, 24 (1), pp. 69-87.

Fuchs, Ch. (2009). Some Reflections on Manuel Castells’ Book “Communication Power”. Triple C, 7(1), 94-108.

Geĉiene, I. (2002). The Notion of Power in the Theories of Bourdieu, Foucault and Baudrillard. Sociologija, Mintis ir veiksmas, 2.

Giddens, A. (1985). The Nation State and Violence. Cambridge, Polity Press.

Hacker, K. and Van Dijk, J (eds.) (2000). Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice. London, Sage.

Hautala, L. (2018). Facebook’s new data policy: Answers to your privacy questions, Retrieved on 24 April 2018 from https://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-data-policy-answers-to-your-privacy-questions-cambridge-analytica/

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Kampmark, B. (2007). What Jeremy Bentham and Facebook have in common. Giving Good Face. [online]. Counterpunch. Last accessed on 1 December 2009 at http://www.counterpunch.org/2007/08/07/giving-good-face

Kirkpatrick, D. (2010). The Facebook effect. Virgin Books.

Mansell, R. (2009). The Power of New Media Networks. In: Hammer, R. and Kellner, D. (eds). Media/ Cultural Studies: Critical Approaches. Peter Lang.

Marcuse, H. (2002). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London, Routledge.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital: Critique of Political Economy v. 1. Penguin Classics.

O’Reilly, T. and Battelle, J. (2009). Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five years on. O’Reilly Media. Web 2.0 Summit. Special report.

Reuters (2017). Peter Thiel sells most of remaining Facebook stake, Retrieved from https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-stake/peter-thiel-sells-most-of-remaining-facebook-stake-idUKKBN1DM2BQ on 22 April 2018.

Rølhe, T. (2005). Power, reason, closure: critical perspectives on new media theory. New Media Society, 7 (3), 403-422.

Tapscott, D. and Williams, A. (2007). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York, Penguin.

Sarup, M. (1993). An Introductory guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism. Prentice Hall.

Statista (2018). Leading countries based on number of Facebook users as of April 2018 (in millions) Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/268136/top-15-countries-based-on-number-of-facebook-users/ on 24th April 2018.

Thompson, J. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge, Polity.

Vejby, R. and Wittkower, D.E. (2010). Spectacle 2.0? In: Wittkower, D.E. (ed). Facebook and Philosophy. Carus Publishing Company.

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York, Bedminster Press.

WHO OWNS FACEBOOK? [online]. Last accessed on 23 April 2018 at http://whoownsfacebook.com




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17349/jmc118106

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Media Critiques [JMC]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.